DatasourceFlowsDetailsDataflowConfigTableMappingsRulesInner¶
- class openapi_client.models.datasource_flows_details_dataflow_config_table_mappings_rules_inner.DatasourceFlowsDetailsDataflowConfigTableMappingsRulesInner(**data)[source]¶
Bases:
BaseModel- old_value: Optional[StrictStr]¶
- rule_action: Optional[StrictStr]¶
- rule_id: Optional[StrictStr]¶
- rule_name: Optional[StrictStr]¶
- rule_target: Optional[StrictStr]¶
- rule_type: Optional[StrictStr]¶
- value: Optional[StrictStr]¶
- object_locator: Optional[DatasetLineageTaskFiltersInfoSourceTableInfo]¶
- data_type: Optional[DatasourceFlowsDetailsDataflowConfigTableMappingsRulesInnerDataType]¶
- filters: Optional[List[DatasetLineageTaskFiltersInfoFilterRulesInner]]¶
- model_config: ClassVar[ConfigDict] = {'populate_by_name': True, 'protected_namespaces': (), 'validate_assignment': True}¶
Configuration for the model, should be a dictionary conforming to [ConfigDict][pydantic.config.ConfigDict].
- classmethod from_json(json_str)[source]¶
Create an instance of DatasourceFlowsDetailsDataflowConfigTableMappingsRulesInner from a JSON string
- Return type:
Optional[Self]
- to_dict()[source]¶
Return the dictionary representation of the model using alias.
This has the following differences from calling pydantic’s self.model_dump(by_alias=True):
None is only added to the output dict for nullable fields that were set at model initialization. Other fields with value None are ignored.
- Return type:
Dict[str,Any]
- classmethod from_dict(obj)[source]¶
Create an instance of DatasourceFlowsDetailsDataflowConfigTableMappingsRulesInner from a dict
- Return type:
Optional[Self]
- model_fields: ClassVar[dict[str, FieldInfo]] = {'data_type': FieldInfo(annotation=Union[DatasourceFlowsDetailsDataflowConfigTableMappingsRulesInnerDataType, NoneType], required=False, alias='data-type', alias_priority=2), 'filters': FieldInfo(annotation=Union[List[DatasetLineageTaskFiltersInfoFilterRulesInner], NoneType], required=False), 'object_locator': FieldInfo(annotation=Union[DatasetLineageTaskFiltersInfoSourceTableInfo, NoneType], required=False, alias='object-locator', alias_priority=2), 'old_value': FieldInfo(annotation=Union[Annotated[str, Strict(strict=True)], NoneType], required=False, alias='old-value', alias_priority=2), 'rule_action': FieldInfo(annotation=Union[Annotated[str, Strict(strict=True)], NoneType], required=False, alias='rule-action', alias_priority=2), 'rule_id': FieldInfo(annotation=Union[Annotated[str, Strict(strict=True)], NoneType], required=False, alias='rule-id', alias_priority=2), 'rule_name': FieldInfo(annotation=Union[Annotated[str, Strict(strict=True)], NoneType], required=False, alias='rule-name', alias_priority=2), 'rule_target': FieldInfo(annotation=Union[Annotated[str, Strict(strict=True)], NoneType], required=False, alias='rule-target', alias_priority=2), 'rule_type': FieldInfo(annotation=Union[Annotated[str, Strict(strict=True)], NoneType], required=False, alias='rule-type', alias_priority=2), 'value': FieldInfo(annotation=Union[Annotated[str, Strict(strict=True)], NoneType], required=False)}¶
Metadata about the fields defined on the model, mapping of field names to [FieldInfo][pydantic.fields.FieldInfo].
This replaces Model.__fields__ from Pydantic V1.
- model_post_init(__context)¶
This function is meant to behave like a BaseModel method to initialise private attributes.
It takes context as an argument since that’s what pydantic-core passes when calling it.
- Parameters:
self (
BaseModel) – The BaseModel instance.__context (
Any) – The context.
- Return type:
None